
Somewhere along the way, “being regulated” started to sound a lot like being able to handle everything on your own.
Calm yourself down.
Manage your emotions.
Get yourself back to okay.
And I think that can turn regulation into an individual accomplishment.
Something we should eventually be able to do independently.
The more capable we become, the less we should need from other people.
But I’m not sure that is what regulation actually means.
Regulation isn’t simply being calm.
Sometimes responding well to what is happening means mobilizing. Speaking up. Pulling back. Moving. Resting. Reaching toward someone. Taking action.
For me, regulation has much more to do with flexibility.
Can I notice what is happening?
Can I respond to what is actually here?
Can my experience shift as circumstances change?
Can I have access to more than one way of responding, rather than feeling locked into the same pattern every time?
That feels very different from simply asking whether I can calm myself down.
And it also changes the way I think about relationship.
Even when I experience myself as handling something on my own, I am not separate from the relational environment around me.
The people around us are part of the information our nervous system is taking in.
A shift in someone’s voice, expression, distance, attention, or responsiveness can change what happens in us, often before we consciously evaluate it.
It’s a little like weather.
We don’t have to decide that the wind has changed before we begin responding to it. We are already in it.
Relationship can give us more room to respond, and it can make that room smaller.
Either way, it is affecting the experience.
That is one reason I think co-regulation can be misunderstood when it is described as one person simply helping another person become calm.
Relationship is doing more than that.
Another person’s presence, absence, intensity, steadiness, withdrawal, or responsiveness can all shape what becomes possible in a moment.
The history between two people matters.
Trust matters.
Power matters.
Attunement matters.
Rupture and repair matter.
So other people are not only people we turn to when we need help regulating.
They are also part of what we are responding to in the first place.
And I think this becomes especially important when we start talking about self-sufficiency.
There is a lot of value placed on being able to handle things yourself.
Needing less.
Managing your own emotions.
Not depending too much on anyone.
There can be something important in developing more capacity to respond to our own experience.
Being able to notice ourselves, support ourselves, and make choices from within our own experience matters.
But that is different from making independence the measure of health.
Sometimes “I can do this myself” reflects real capacity.
And sometimes it reflects a history of learning that needing someone else wasn’t going to work.
From the outside, those can look very similar.
Internally, they may be very different experiences.
Maybe the question isn’t:
Can I regulate myself without needing anyone else?
Maybe it is:
Do I have enough flexibility to respond to myself, to other people, and to what is happening between us?
Can I draw on myself?
Can I receive something from another person?
Can I notice when relationship gives me more room?
Can I notice when it narrows that room?
Can I move toward connection without losing myself in it?
Can I step back without believing I have to do everything alone?
That feels like a more human way of thinking about regulation to me.
Not as mastery over ourselves.
Not as proving we can do it alone.
But as having more ways to respond to what is happening, both within us and around us.
We were never separate nervous systems trying to master ourselves in isolation.
We have always been affecting and being affected by one another.
Wishing you wellness,
Keri Sawyer








